Eddelbuttel v. Durrell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Twenty-first District Court, County of Plumas. Clough, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
The plaintiffs, by this action, sought to restrain the defendants from the diversion of certain waters of a certain creek in Plumas County. The grounds for the relief asked are thus stated in the amended complaint: “ Plaintiffs, by this amended complaint, for a cause of action, allege, that since the 10th day of December, 1875, they have been and they now are the owners of, and entitled to the use, occupation, and possession of all the waters naturally flowing in the south branch of Willow *278CVeek, in Plumas township, Plumas County, California, except that certain amount to which the…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.