Legal Opinion

Kittle v. Pfeiffer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Twelfth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action to enjoin the defendants from erecting and constructing buildings and other obstructions in certain streets in the City of San Francisco, known as “ Belle Air Place ” and “ Pfeiffer Street.” The Court below, after the trial of the issues raised by the parties, rendered a judgment dismissing the complaint, and for costs against the plaintiff, from which he appeals.

From the record in this case it appears, that on the twenty-fourth day of October, 1854, J. L. Folsom and the defendant, William A. Pfeiffer, conveyed, by quitclaim deeds, to the City of San Fran*488cisco, certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. The Town of Pawlet v. D. CLARK & OTHERSSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  4. Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. People v. LambierNew York Supreme Court · 1847

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Weyl v. Sonoma Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
  3. London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. City of Eureka v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Stone v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API