Legal Opinion
Laurent v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 2006No. 06 Civ. 2280(MBM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Timothy Laurent, Smeeta Sharon, and Michael A. Weil sue Defendant PriceWaterhouseCoopers (“PWC”) alleging that PWC’s Retirement Benefit Accumulation Plan for Employees of Pri-ceWaterhouseCoopers LLP (“the RBAP”) violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (2000) (“ERISA”). In particular plaintiffs allege that the RBAP violates ERISA’s standards for calculating lump-sum benefits payable from a cash balance pension plan, standards for calculating accrued benefits, and age discrimination rules. PWC…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Laurent v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- In Re Citigroup Pension Plan ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.