Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
On September 2, 1974, following almost a decade of studying the Nation’s private pension plans, Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. As a predicate for this comprehensive and reticulated statute,1 Congress made de*362tailed findings which recited, in part, “that the continued well-being and security of millions of employees and their dependents are directly affected by these plans; [and] that owing to the termination of plans before requisite funds have been accumulated, employees and their beneficiaries have been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by694 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
689 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.