Legal Opinion

Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 30, 1980No. 78-1557PublishedCited by 694 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

On September 2, 1974, following almost a decade of studying the Nation’s private pension plans, Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 829, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. As a predicate for this comprehensive and reticulated statute,1 Congress made de*362tailed findings which recited, in part, “that the continued well-being and security of millions of employees and their dependents are directly affected by these plans; [and] that owing to the termination of plans before requisite funds have been accumulated, employees and their beneficiaries have been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by694 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

689 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API