Legal Opinion
In Re Citigroup Pension Plan ERISA Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 2006No. 05 CIV. 5296SASPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Lonecke, Raymond Duffy, Anne Nelson, Robert S. Fash and Craig A. Harris, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, filed consolidated actions alleging that the Citibuilder Cash Balance Plan (“Plan”) violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. In summary, plaintiffs lodge three challenges against the Plan. First, they challenge the legality of the Plan’s accrual formula. Second, they assert that because Plan participants never received…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hirt v. Equitable Retirement Plan for Employees, Managers & AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Amara v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Kifafi v. Hilton Hotels Retirement PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Drutis v. Rand McNally & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In re Citigroup Pension Plan Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.