D.A.S., Matter Of
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BRIDGES, Justice.
This case presents the question of the appropriate procedure to be used when an attorney appointed to represent a juvenile in an appeal from a delinquency adjudication concludes that no meritorious grounds exist for appeal. Counsel for appellant D.A.S. has filed an Anders brief with an accompanying motion to withdraw as counsel.1 Proceeding as if this case involved an adult, counsel has also notified appellant of his right to file a pro se brief. Because a delinquency action is civil in nature and because a minor is under a legal disability and cannot appear…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Byrd v. Woodruff, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- J.R.W. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re H.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Matter of A.L.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Clyce v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Chance Clyce v. Nadine ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- In Re HVTexas Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.