Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Woodruff

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 31, 1994No. 05-93-00020-CVPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, Justice.

This is a summary judgment case. Kassie Renee Byrd sued Katherine Woodruff and her former and current law firms for legal malpractice. She also sued her guardian ad litem, Jay Downs, and his law firm for breach of his duties as a guardian ad litem. The district court granted Woodruff and Downs summary judgment, without specifying the grounds for its ruling. Kassie asserts that the district court erred by granting summary judgment on any of the grounds raised in Downs’s and Woodruffs motions.

We hold that a guardian ad litem appointed under rule 173 of the rules of…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Davis v. BaylessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Avary v. Bank of America, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  3. Honeycutt v. Billingsley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Dallas County v. HalseyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In re H.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API