Legal Opinion
Isbrandtsen Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 27, 1966No. 66-C-232PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, Chief Judge.
A collective-bargaining agreement between the petitioner, Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. (hereinafter the employer) and the respondent, District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, AFL-CIO (hereinafter the union), contains an arbitration clause. The agreement resulted from negotiations between the employer and the union, as representative of the employer’s supervisory employees. A dispute arose between the employer and union when the employer sold certain of its vessels to American Export Lines which was a party to a collective-bargaining agreement (as to its supervisory…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n v. Interlake Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Raymond Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and United Transportation Union, Local 1594Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Arnold London v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Florin Dente v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Local 90, Anunincorporated Labor OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.