Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
484 U.S. 343 (1988)
CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY ET AL.
v.
COHILL, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
No. 86-1021.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 10, 1987
Decided January 20, 1988
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Walter P. DeForest III argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.
Allan J. Opsitnick argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · MarshallJustice Marshall
The question before us is whether a federal district court has discretion under the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction to remand a properly removed…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by209 opinions
- Northbay Healthcare Grp., Inc. v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- (PC) Hill v. CrossDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) Johnson v. ChauDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PC) White v. LizaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC)Johnson v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.