Legal Opinion
Raymond Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and United Transportation Union, Local 1594
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 18, 1976No. 75--1528PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from an order entered by the United States Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellant Raymond Crilly, a bus driver, sued his employer, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), and his union, United Transportation Union Local 1594 (Local), alleging that SEPTA had discharged him in breach of the collective bargaining agreement between the defendants, and that the Local had breached its duty of fair representation by failing to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maryland v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Dykes v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Nedd v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Loftus v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.