Legal Opinion

Oddo v. Hedde

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1950No. Civ. 17780PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Respondents sued for declaratory relief. Also they demanded cancellation of two notes and two trust deeds securing same, which they had executed in partial fulfillment of a contract they had executed with appellants. The notes were given as payment for labor and materials used in the construction of a building to be used by Dr. Oddo as a clinic. The basis for such demand was that at the time of executing the four instruments, appellants had no building contractor’s license. Judgment was entered as demanded, except that in addition to the cancellation of the second trust deed and note for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API