Legal Opinion
Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1967No. Civ. 30980PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal which involves the interpretation of section 654 and other sections of the Business and Professions Code with reference to doctor-owned pharmacies.
In a declaratory relief action brought against the California State Board of Medical Examiners, sometimes hereinafter referred to as Board, filed in Los Angeles County on May 18, 1965, Magan Medical Clinic and its nine partners, Rees-Stealy Medical Clinic and its 20 partners, Santa Barbara Medical Clinic and its 19 partners sought a declaration from the court that section 654, Business and Professions Code, does not require a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Daniel v. Family Security Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Beck v. American Health Group International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Blinder v. Division of Narcotic EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Arizona Tractor Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.