Legal Opinion

Richardson & Holland, Inc. v. Owen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1928No. Nos. 21233, 21232. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In these cases, the respondent corporation sought to recover damages resulting to -its property; and the individual respondent sought damages for personal injury, medical and hospital expenses sustained by him, by reason of a steam vessel, tank or boiler manufactured for the corporation by appellants, bursting.

Both cases involve substantially the same questions of law and fact and were tried together. Separate findings of fact, conclusions and judgment were entered in each case; the cases were consolidated by stipulation and argued together on appeal. After trial to the court without a jury,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Etheridge v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  3. Twedt v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Torgeson v. HanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hutteball v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Carr v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lesicich v. North River Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McAbee v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API