Legal Opinion

Carr v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1950No. 31142PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was instituted by Michael A. Carr against the appellants to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a rear-end collision between their truck and the automobile in which respondent was riding. A jury rendered a verdict in favor of respondent. An appeal has been taken from the judgment entered. The main questions raised by appellants are whether competent evidence was submitted by respondent that his injuries were caused by the impact of the vehicles, and whether there was sufficient proof of special damages.

The record shows that at some time during his boyhood,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tonkovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Plano Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bekelski v. O. F. Neal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Manning v. PomereneNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Graham v. Police Firemen's Ins. Ass'n.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bitzan v. ParisiWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Nelson v. FairfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Roberts v. Dredge FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Parris v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API