Legal Opinion
Youshah v. Staudinger
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Allan L. Winick, J.
An inquest, as a result of a default, was ordered by another Justice of this court. Testimony was taken in open court which revealed that plaintiff invested money in an escort and dating service. A corporation, Perry Blais, Inc., was formed to *351carry on the business. The service was known as LTmage. Plaintiff rented an apartment in Manhattan, paid the rent and charges for the telephones. Plaintiff also paid for the furnishings in the apartment. He advertised and hired "personnel” for the business. The business expanded to another apartment in another…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rokina Optical Co. v. Camera King, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Boorman v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Mendelsohn v. A & D Catering Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FAMILIA ROSARIO v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011