Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & Nomberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1979PublishedCited by 284 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether an arbitrator’s award which enforces the terms of a restrictive covenant of employment is unenforceable as being contrary to public policy.
Respondent Murray Nomberg was employed by the petitioner Local 1115 Joint Board in April, 1973 as a business agent in its health-care division. Nomberg’s responsibilities *627included, among other tasks, the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements, the processing of members’ grievances, and the general organization of employees at various facilities. Practically all of Nomberg’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by284 opinions
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.