Legal Opinion
Rokina Optical Co. v. Camera King, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1984PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for a new trial on the issue of damages.
This action was commenced by summons and complaint alleging that defendant had accepted merchandise delivered by plaintiff for which payment was due. The complaint demanded judgment in the amount of $90,161.30, representing the amount allegedly owed for the merchandise. In its answer, defendant contended that certain of the goods had been paid for by check, that other payments were made by applying the cost to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by140 opinions
- Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- C. Russell Kelleran, Jr., Eighteen Mile Corporation v. Slavko Andrijevic, A/K/A Al AndrieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Amusement Business Underwriters v. American International Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wilson v. Galicia Contr. & Restoration Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Curiale v. Ardra InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.