Legal Opinion
McClelland v. Climax Hosiery Mills
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHtjbbs, J.
The complaint alleges that on April 19, 1926, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract in which it was agreed that the plaintiff was to have charge of the sales of the defendant at a salary of $12,000 a year for the balance of the year and for the year 1927; that the contract was carried out and the plaintiff was paid according to its terms; that he continued to work until and during the month of June, 1928, but that the $1,000 due for that month’s work had not been paid. It is also alleged that on or about January 12, 1928, the parties entered into a further agreement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thompson v. . HalbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Emery v. . BaltzNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Ware Bros. v. Cortland Cart & Carriage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Bossout v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Foster v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1833
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Katz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Rokina Optical Co. v. Camera King, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.