Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Weiss
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 22, 2005No. Misc. Docket AG No. 15, September Term, 2004Published
1Opinion of the Court
886 A.2d 606 (2005)
389 Md. 531
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
Randy A. WEISS.
Misc. Docket AG No. 15, September Term, 2004.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
November 22, 2005.
Glenn M. Grossman, Deputy Bar Counsel (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Atty. Grievance Com'n of MD), for Petitioner.
Abbe David Lowell, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.
CATHELL, Judge.
Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, petitioner, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-773(b),[1] filed a Petition for Disciplinary or…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.