Legal Opinion
Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. Nemaha Brown Watershed Joint District No. 7
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 23, 2013No. 06-CV-2248-CM-DJWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAVID J. WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Compel Defendant’s Responses to Discovery (ECF No. 229). Plaintiff, Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas (“Tribe”), requests an order compelling Defendant, Nemaha Brown Watershed Joint District No. 7 (“District”), to produce documents responsive to the Tribe’s Rule 34 Request for Production of Documents on Counts Five and Six of the Tribe’s Second *612Amended Complaint and compelling the District to produce and permit inspection of all computers by technical…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Norman v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Midland Bancor, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- KOROTKI v. COOPER LEVENSON, APRIL NIEDELMAN & WAGENHEIM, P.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Khoury v. Intermountain Health Care Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2024
- Laber v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Manufacturers Alliance Insurance Company v. BakerDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025