Legal Opinion

Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square Bank

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1985No. 84-2304PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 25, 1983, the plaintiff served on defendant Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. a request for production of documents. The request for production of documents included the following:

7. With respect to the conduct or preparation of any annual, quarterly, interim, or other compilation, review or audit by Peat, Marwick concerning Penn Square Bank:

$ s}s * ¡H . H:

ix. Any second partner review, office review or national office review of the working papers or other documents that are the subject of this request, including specifically any such review undertaken subsequent to July 5, 1982 ...…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Biliske v. American Live Stock InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Mont.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. DabneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API