Legal Opinion

Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National Insurance

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 4, 2003No. 01-2441-CMPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES P. O’HARA, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), this case comes before the court on the motion of the defendant, Clarendon National Insurance Company (“Clarendon”), for a protective order (doc. 61) relating to an allegedly inadvertently produced attorney work-product document. This motion has been thoroughly briefed by the parties,1 and the court is now prepared to rule. As explained below, the court will grant Clarendon’s motion and direct the plaintiff, Employer’s Reinsurance Corp. (“ERC”), to return to Clarendon all copies…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. House v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  4. FMC Corp. v. Vendo Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
  5. Denise v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  2. Kannaday v. BallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  3. New Jersey v. Sprint Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  4. Towne Place Condo. Ass'n v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API