Legal Opinion
Norman v. Young
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1970No. 265-69PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Norman have perfected this appeal after having a default judgment taken against them for failure to produce documents, etc., as the District Court ordered. They herein challenge, inter alia, the right of the Court to enter a default judgment pursuant to Rule 37(b) (2) (iii), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., on the grounds that the documents requested were not in existence and that a capricious order was entered because of the Court’s dissatisfaction with the papers ultimately tendered.
The chronicle of events leading to this appeal is not disputed and appears as follows.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc., Ely Valley Mines, Inc., and John Janney v. Helen Dolman, John Janney v. Helen DolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. International Union Of Petroleum And Industrial Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Rechtzigel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.