Legal Opinion
Sneeden v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 27, 1995No. Cong. Ref. No. 92-865XPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT OF THE REVIEW PANEL
HARKINS, Senior Judge.
The House of Representatives in H.Res. 568, on October 4, 1992, referred to the United States Claims Court1, a private bill, H.R. 6012, a bill for the relief of Donald W. Sneeden, Mary S. Sneeden and Henry C. Best. The hearing officer has conducted an investigation, including a trial from January 18-22, 1994, and has filed a report. Sneeden v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 671 (1994). The hearing officer has determined the facts and concluded that an award to plaintiffs would be a gratuity. Plaintiffs’ exceptions to the hearing officer’s findings…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Librach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Anthony R. Sanders v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Krygoski Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Green Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.