Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Laraway

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1933No. 2774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WILLIAMS, J.

The first inquiry is whether there should have been a directed verdict in favor of the defendant below. The circumstances under which a claim of an employe for injury or death by lightning while at work is compensable has received consideration many times. See the following authorities:

L.R.A., 1918-F, 937;

13 A.L.R., 977;

40 A.L.R., 401;

46 A.L.R., 1218;

53 A.L.R., 1084;

28 R.C.L., 806, par. 94.

In the case of Slanina v Industrial Commission, 117 Oh St, 329, it was held that where an employe, while riding in an automobile in the course of his employment, was injured as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RochesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Industrial Commission v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Adams v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Zaft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Murphy v. Industrial Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API