Legal Opinion

Zaft v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Plaintiff, appellant, Eose Zaft, on September 10, 1936, was employed as a seamstress in the factory of The Friedman Cloak Company, a contributor to the Workmen’s Compensation Fund. For some time before that date she had had a cold. During her lunch period that day, while she was sitting in a chair at the table where she worked in the factory, which chair was about a foot from a window, another employee opened that window and plaintiff says “I felt a kind of a stroke in my face; kind of like a wind or something hit me”; and “Well it was wind. It was a kind of a heavy wind. ’ ’ She closed the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slanina v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Industrial Commission v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Industrial Commission v. CardenOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Industrial Commission v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Industrial Commission v. ArmacostOhio Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Breidler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Patterson Special No. 5 School District v. DietrichOhio Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API