Murphy v. Industrial Commission

That the plaintiff was employed by an employer who had complied with the Workmen’s Compensation Act and received injuries during his employment is admitted.

The jury was instructed to return a verdict for the defendant on theory that the plaintiff’s injuries were not “occasioned in the course of such workman’s employment” to which injuries compensation is limited by Section 85 of Article II of the Ohio Constitution and by Secton 1465-68, General Code. The case now comes before the court upon the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

*90The evidence was that the plaintiff was a regular employee of…