Legal Opinion

Moore v. Standard Mineral Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1996No. 9410IC652PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendants appeal an Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the Commission), contending the Commission erred by basing plaintiffs compensation rate on wages earned “at the time he was first diagnosed with silicosis rather than when he was removed from the industry” which exposed him to the hazard. For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the Commission.

Pertinent facts and procedural information are as follows: From 16 March 1959 to 18 July 1960 and from 19 February 1963 to 19 May 1967, claimant was exposed to silica dust while employed by defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Southeastern Magnesia & Asbestos Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Wilder v. Amatex Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Pittman v. Thomas & HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Clark v. ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Austin v. Continental General TireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Abernathy v. Sandoz Chemicals/Clariant Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Pope v. ManvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Albritton v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API