Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Amatex Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1985No. 239PA84PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Plaintiff seeks damages for the disease asbestosis which he claims was caused by his exposure to products manufactured, sold or distributed by defendants.1 Plaintiff alleges that he contracted the disease asbestosis through years of on-the-job contact with asbestos products manufactured, sold or distributed by the various defendants. Defendant appellees, after answering, moved for summary judgment, asserting in their motions that the “applicable statutes of limitations and/or repose” barred plaintiffs claim. The trial court granted their motions and entered summary *552judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Moore v. Standard Mineral Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. Dunn v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API