Legal Opinion
Ken-Crete Products Co. v. State Highway Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The two issues presented by this appeal are:(1) Did the trial court err in receiving evidence as to the cost of installing an overhead conveyor which allegedly was necessary to maintain the same cost of production in Ken-Crete’s plant as existed before condemnation ?(2) Did the trial court err in refusing to take testimony as to whether the jury returned a quotient verdict ?
Receipt of Evidence with Respect to Cost of Installing Overhead Conveyor.
As a result of thé taking of the .44 acres, Ken-Crete was deprived of the use of this land on which to store piles of sand and gravel used in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Olson v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Dishmaker v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Nowaczyk v. Marathon CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weeden v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. AmodtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Besnah v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Volbrecht v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.