Carazalla v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
In considering appellants’ contention that they are entitled to a new trial we find the issues presented on this appeal to be as follows:(1) Was it error for the trial court to refuse appellants’ request for an instruction which would have required the jury to disregard all evidence as to depreciation in the market value of the remaining portion of land after the taking which tended to show that such remaining land had lost its value for commercial purposes as a result of the highway relocation and making it a “controlled access” highway?(2) Was it error for the trial court to refuse…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Jeffery v. OsborneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Colusa & Hamilton Railroad v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. CalkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.