Legal Opinion

Nowaczyk v. Marathon County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellants' assign as error that the court: (1) Admitted testimony that the highway benefited the farm. (2) Permitted witnesses to testify to separate items of damage. (3) Refused to permit cross-examination of defendant’s witnesses as to value. (4) Refused to grant a new trial for inadequacy of the damages assessed. (5) Refused to permit testimony that the highway would periodically flood plaintiffs’ land. (6) Permitted witnesses to testify as to the cost of fencing the highway. It is also assigned as error that (7) the trial judge was prejudiced against the plaintiffs.(1) The particular…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Grant CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. American States Security Co. v. Milwaukee Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Riddle v. Lodi Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Zindell v. Central Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fiorini v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ken-Crete Products Co. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Utech v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API