Volbrecht v. State Highway Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issues on this appeal concern the admissibility of evidence concerning the presence of fill dirt in valuing the land before and after the taking and the accuracy of the instruction to the jury in this regard.
The state argues that before evidence of a mineral deposit may be admitted into evidence in a condemnation case a foundation must be laid to show that the presence of the mineral deposit affects the fair market value of the land. Cameron Development Co. v. United States (5th Cir. 1944), 145 Fed. (2d) 209; United States v. Land in Dry Bed of Rosamond Lake, Cal. (D. C. Cal. 1956), 143…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Hoy v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- N.Y.C.R.R. Co. v. . MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- State Highway Commissioner v. FeginMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Ken-Crete Products Co. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Herro v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Wisconsin Retired Teachers Ass'n v. Employe Trust Funds BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Milwaukee Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Besnah v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.