Legal Opinion

Besnah v. City of Fond Du Lac

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1967PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is:

Is there any credible evidence to sustain the findings of the jury?

In condemnation cases just compensation for the taking is what the owner has lost, not what the condemnor has gained. Volbrecht v. State Highway Comm. (1966), 81 Wis. (2d) 640, 647, 143 N. W. (2d) 429. The measure of the owner’s loss in case of a partial taking, such as this case, is provided by sec. 32.09 (6), Stats., in part:

“In the case of a partial taking, the compensation to be paid by the condemnor shall be determined by deducting from the fair market value of the whole property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Commodore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Weeden v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bear v. Kenosha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Grant CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Herro v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Milwaukee Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Arents v. ANR Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API