Ficken, Ivan v. Alvarez, Aida
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
A pro se Title VII plaintiff seeks review of a district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — 5(f)(1) (1994). Because this non-final order does not qualify as a collateral order within the meaning of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal.
I
An attorney, appellant Ivan Fieken worked in various capacities for the Small Business Administration. Fieken claims that after he provided statements to an SBA Equal Employment Opportunity…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United States v. Henry G. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Powell v. CastanedaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Sai v. Transportation Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Akbulut v. McAleenanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Aylworth v. Wichita, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.