Legal Opinion

Ficken, Ivan v. Alvarez, Aida

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 10, 1998No. 97-5190PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

A pro se Title VII plaintiff seeks review of a district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — 5(f)(1) (1994). Because this non-final order does not qualify as a collateral order within the meaning of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal.

I

An attorney, appellant Ivan Fieken worked in various capacities for the Small Business Administration. Fieken claims that after he provided statements to an SBA Equal Employment Opportunity…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry G. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Powell v. CastanedaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Sai v. Transportation Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Akbulut v. McAleenanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Aylworth v. Wichita, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API