Legal Opinion
Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth Rushen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1986No. 83-5510PublishedCited by 2,033 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Wilborn appeals a grant of summary judgment for defendants Rushen and Escalderon in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for deprivation of property without due process. Before summary judgment was granted, Wilborn had appealed the district court’s denial of his motion for request of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). 1 Because such orders are not immediately ap-pealable interlocutory orders, we find that the district court properly retained jurisdiction after Wilborn’s appeal of that order. Furthermore, incident to our review of the district court’s final decision in this case,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,033 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- David Poe Wood v. Vernon G. Housewright, George SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
2,028 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.