Sai v. Transportation Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant Sai (identified by an adopted mononym) seeks interlocutory review of a district court decision denying him appointed counsel as.a collateral order. Sai’s allegations, against the Transportation Security. Administration and other defendants include violation of federal statutes prohibiting discriminatory treatment of disabled persons. The statutory scheme specifically authorizes court appointment of counsel. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a-3(a), 12188(a)(1). However, the mechanism, is not funded, and it is subject to the district court’s broad discretion, The difficulties in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennie Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Susan B. CASTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO SPRINGS CABLEVISION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Ficken, Ivan v. Alvarez, AidaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth A. Appleby v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sena v. KennewayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Atryzek v. RI Attorney General's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2022
- Diaz v. WallDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021
- Hanson v. RI Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2019
- Stack v. KuligowskiDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.