Legal Opinion

Aylworth v. Wichita, City of

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 19, 2025No. 6:25-cv-01005Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WENDY M. AYLWORTH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 25-1005-EFM-GEB ) CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, ) SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS, ) BETH NORDICK, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Wendy M. Aylworth’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 28 USC § 1915(e)(1) (“Motion”) (ECF No. 4). For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED without prejudice as to refiling. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) provides discretionary authority for the Court to “request an attorney to represent any person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durre v. DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Susan B. CASTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO SPRINGS CABLEVISION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Ficken, Ivan v. Alvarez, AidaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API