Doughty v. Laubach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an action in re-plevin and also to recover the alleged balance of purchase price evidenced by note, together with interest and attorney’s fee as provided for in said note, commenced by plaintiff in error in the court below.
The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, the order in which they appeared in the court below.
Upon affidavit and bond of plaintiff, a re-plevin writ was issued, which was executed by the sheriff taking possession of a certain wheat combine referred to in the pleadings which was delivered to plaintiff at the commencement of the suit.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Klein v. MuhlhausenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Tax/Investments Concepts, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Superior Distributing Corp. v. HargroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- PAN MUTUAL ROYALTIES, INC. v. McElhineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Ryker v. DickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.