Legal Opinion

Wayne Tank & Pump Co. v. Harper

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1926No. 16829PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties appear in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff sued defendant in replevin for a gasoline pump, basing i-ts action upon a conditional sales contract retaining title in plaintiff, alleging a balance due. The written contract contained a warranty against defective workmanship and material, providing that defective parts, when returned to plaintiff, would be replaced. Defendant answered by general denial and counterclaimed for damages, alleging that the pump was so defeot-tive in its parts as not to be fit tor the purposes for which it was made and sold,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Security Benefit Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Whitehead v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Doughty v. LaubachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Chowins v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Louis Berkman Co. v. Unger Metals Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Perry v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API