Legal Opinion
Innis Arden Golf Club v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 28, 2007No. 3:06cv1352 (JBA)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS [DOCS. # 61, 63, 64]
Plaintiff Innis Arden Golf Club (“IAGC”), located in Stamford and Old Greenwich, brings this action against the defendants for allegedly polluting its land with polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”). Defendants Pitney Bowes, Inc. (“Pitney Bowes”), Pateley Associates 1, LLC (“Pateley Associates”), and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. (“Metro-North”) own and/or control property adjacent to IAGC. Defendants 375 Fairfield Ave. Associates, the Goldblums, 1 the Bronx Bar Supply Co., and Global Development Enterprises…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leitner v. Westchester Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Innis Arden Golf Club v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Innis Arden Golf Club v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- 316 Courtland Avenue, LLC v. Frontier Communications CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Carol Leitner v. Westchester Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.