Legal Opinion

People v. Dibacco

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided March 9, 2004No. CRA 3989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.*

This appeal is taken from convictions for exceeding 100 miles per hour and reckless driving. Appellant contends the court erred in reducing the reckless driving charge from a misdemeanor to an infraction. He also contends the conviction for speeding is improper because that charge was a lesser included offense to reckless driving. Finally, he asserts that being sentenced for both infractions amounts to dual punishment in violation of *Supp. 3Penal Code section 654. We reverse the reckless driving conviction, finding the court had no jurisdiction to reduce the charge to an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. LohbauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. Superior Court (Perez)California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. IniguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DibaccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API