Legal Opinion

People v. Geiger

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1984No. Crim. 23105PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment imposed on a jury verdict finding him guilty of second degree burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.)1 His principal contention is that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury, in accordance with defendant’s theory of the case, that he could be convicted of vandalism (§ 594), a related offense not necessarily included in burglary.2 We find merit in that contention, on the facts of this case. Clearly a defendant has no general right to have the jury presented with a shopping list of alternatives to the crimes charged by the prosecution.…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API