Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Perez)

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1995No. D023005PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

The narrow issue presented in this mandamus proceeding is whether a trial court’s long-established statutory authority to declare an alternative felony, or “wobbler,” a misdemeanor under Penal Code 1 section 17, subdivision (b) was abrogated by the recently enacted “three strikes” law. 2 We conclude it was not and accordingly deny the People’s writ petition. 3

Factual and Procedural Background

On July 20, 1994, about 9 a.m., San Diego police officers on routine patrol noticed a group of men congregated in front of Perez’s residence, which is located in an area “known for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API