Legal Opinion

People v. Iniguez

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 2002No. C037230PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, Acting P. J.

Defendant Juan Manuel Iniguez, Jr., pleaded guilty to conduct described at the time of the plea and at sentencing as “conspiracy to commit attempted murder.” The court imposed a term of nine years, which corresponds to the aggravated punishment for the object of the purported conspiracy, attempted murder. Defendant appeals, contending that the court erred in selecting the aggravated term and in computing his custody credits.

The Attorney General has responded that the conviction must be reversed because defendant has been convicted of a nonexistent crime. We will…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. People v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. GionisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Matthew P. Wilhoite v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. E.R.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. DibaccoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2004
  5. In Re ErCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API