People v. Lohbauer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
May a defendant be convicted of an offense which is neither specifically charged in the accusatory pleading nor “necessarily included” within a charged offense, when he does not consent to the substituted charge? We conclude that he may not.
*368Defendant was charged by information with the “violation of Section 459 [of the Penal Code] ... in that ... he entered the house of [victim] . . . with intent to commit theft,” a felony. He pleaded not guilty, waived a jury trial and was tried by the court.
At trial the complainant testified that on September 15, 1978, at about 3 a.m.,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.