Legal Opinion

People v. Lohbauer

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1981No. Crim. 21601PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

May a defendant be convicted of an offense which is neither specifically charged in the accusatory pleading nor “necessarily included” within a charged offense, when he does not consent to the substituted charge? We conclude that he may not.

*368Defendant was charged by information with the “violation of Section 459 [of the Penal Code] ... in that ... he entered the house of [victim] . . . with intent to commit theft,” a felony. He pleaded not guilty, waived a jury trial and was tried by the court.

At trial the complainant testified that on September 15, 1978, at about 3 a.m.,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API