Legal Opinion
Stroop v. Day
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1995No. 94-277PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage
Hughie E. Stroop filed a complaint in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, against James C. Day and Colleen M. Day (the Days), alleging that they were liable for damages he sustained when he was bitten by their dog. Stroop’s complaint alleged negligence and violation of § 27-1-715, MCA. Following trial, the jury found that the Days were not negligent nor had they violated § 27-1-715, MCA. Stroop moved for a new trial on his statutory claim. The District Court granted his motion. The Days appeal the decision of the District Court granting Stroop’s motion for a new trial. Stroop…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Barrett v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Nicholes v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. District Court of the First Judicial District of Montana ex rel. County of LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re the Marriage of SyversonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Borns Ex Rel. Gannon v. VossWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Bradacs v. JiacoboneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bradacs v. JiacoboneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.