Bradacs v. Jiacobone
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
In this dog-bite case, plaintiff, Stephanie Bradacs, appeals as of right from a judgment of no cause of action and dismissal entered on August 26, 1998. The order was entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of defendants, James Jiacobone and Barbara Jiacobone. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in its interpretation of the Michigan dog-bite statute, MCL 287.351; MSA 12.544. Specifically, plaintiff contends that provocation under the statute refers to intentional acts of provocation only, not to unintentional acts. Because we conclude that plaintiffs conduct was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re AyresMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Attard v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Trager v. ThorMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Nicholes v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tate v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brans v. ExtromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hill v. HoigMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Koivisto v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Koivisto v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.