Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Asarco Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1990No. 90-161PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

In this case, a jury returned a verdict for plaintiff Robert P. Barrett on his theory that the defendant Asarco, Inc. breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the employment relationship. The District Court denied Asarco’s motions for directed verdict, judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and new trial and entered its judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict. Asarco appeals. We affirm the District Court.

Asarco raises the following issues on this appeal:(1) Did the District Court err in denying Asarco’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and directed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Patricia Ann Phelps Bailey v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Flanigan v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Krueger v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Christensen v. BrittonMontana Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Marriage of EschenbacherMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kovarik v. KovarikMontana Supreme Court · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API