Nicholes v. Lorenz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
(for affirmance). The principal issue is whether the prior good or bad behavior of a dog is relevant under the present "dog bite” statute which has eliminated proofs of past conduct of a dog and the owner’s knowledge of such as conditions precedent to the owner’s liability. We hold that the challenged testimony entered over defendant’s objection was irrelevant and prejudicial. The Court of Appeals is affirmed.
1
Plaintiffs daughter was bitten by defendant’s dog who was chained and lying in the backyard. Defendant was away with his sons fishing at the time of the incident and his dog Wolf had…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cluett v. RosenthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Goldman v. Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Litzkuhn v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- McDonald v. Champion Iron & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Turnbull v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hiner v. MojicaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Trager v. ThorMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Toney v. BouthillierCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Szkodzinski v. GriffinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tate v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.